The Tomatometer rating – based on the published opinions of hundreds of film and television critics – is a trusted measurement of movie and TV programming quality for millions of moviegoers.
It represents the percentage of professional critic reviews that are positive for a given film or television show.
Certified Fresh Movies and TV shows are Certified Fresh with a steady Tomatometer of 75% or higher after a set amount of reviews (80 for wide-release movies, 40 for limited-release movies, 20 for TV shows), including 5 reviews from Top Critics.
He said the Andersons have not decided whether they want to be reinstated to the club, or receive damages.
“They caused a lot of damage to these people, who are lifelong Disneyphiles,” Reichman said.
“This is crushing to them.” According to the suit, the couple was banned from the club and their membership revoked in October, after what they said was a medical issue was treated as a drunken episode.
“Their being kicked out was retaliation for trying to protect employees and be good members of the club,” Reichman said.
Vintage souvenirs of Disneyland’s exclusive private Club 33, owned by Kevin Doherty include a 1967 placard from the bar, from left, a 1985 prototype for a pocket watch, and cast member name tags.
Unless otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party may serve on any other party no more than 25 written interrogatories, including all discrete subparts. Similarly, the fact that additional time may be needed to respond to some questions (or to some aspects of questions) should not justify a delay in responding to those questions (or other aspects of questions) that can be answered within the prescribed time.
Leave to serve additional interrogatories may be granted to the extent consistent with Rule 26(b)(1) and (2).(2) An interrogatory may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under Rule 26(b). Paragraph (4) is added to make clear that objections must be specifically justified, and that unstated or untimely grounds for objection ordinarily are waived.
An interrogatory is not objectionable merely because it asks for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, but the court may order that the interrogatory need not be answered until designated discovery is complete, or until a pretrial conference or some other time.(b) The interrogatories must be answered:(A) by the party to whom they are directed; or(B) if that party is a public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, or a governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who must furnish the information available to the party.(2) The responding party must serve its answers and any objections within 30 days after being served with the interrogatories. Note also the provisions of revised Rule 26(b)(5), which require a responding party to indicate when it is withholding information under a claim of privilege or as trial preparation materials.
A shorter or longer time may be stipulated to under Rule 29 or be ordered by the court.(3) If the answer to an interrogatory may be determined by examining, auditing, compiling, abstracting, or summarizing a party's business records (including electronically stored information), and if the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer will be substantially the same for either party, the responding party may answer by:(1) specifying the records that must be reviewed, in sufficient detail to enable the interrogating party to locate and identify them as readily as the responding party could; and(2) giving the interrogating party a reasonable opportunity to examine and audit the records and to make copies, compilations, abstracts, or summaries.(As amended Dec. These provisions should be read in light of Rule 26(g), authorizing the court to impose sanctions on a party and attorney making an unfounded objection to an interrogatory..